A=Above Expectations
Maximum pts=25 for 1-6
|
B=Expected
Maximum pts= 22 for 1-6
|
Unacceptable
Maximum pts = 10 for 1-6
|
|
1
|
Rationale meets B criteria and makes an argument convincing to students and community about the value of the cultural relevance of the thematic unit.
|
A rationale explaining the reason for teaching this topic or these skills based on the state frameworks, the district curriculum guide and current knowledge of the discipline including multicultural perspectives on the topic. Rationale should also explain why cooperative learning is an appropriate approach for this unit.
|
Does not meet B criteria.
|
2
|
Task analysis meets B criteria and includes a plan to scaffold any skills or tasks needed for the students to be able to attain the objectives to be learned.
|
A detailed task analysis including the concepts, skills, vocabulary, factual information or other objectives to be learned in the unit and an analysis of what students already know.
|
Does not meet B criteria. No task analysis provide for the thematic-problem based unit or how learning might be constructed to meet the needed tasks.
|
3
|
Diagnosis meets criteria B and includes a plan for teaching or scaffolding the skills that are needed in order to foster true cooperative work.
|
A diagnosis of the level of discussion skills in the class, a diagnosis of the level of group development in the class, and skills needed for success with the task
|
Does not meet B criteria. No diagnosis that takes into account the discussion skills of the group or how to improve them.
|
4
|
Objectives demonstrate at least 20% higher order thinking skills above knowledge and comprehension. That would include application, analysis, synthesis or evaluation.
|
Objectives based on the state frameworks or the district curriculum guide and NETS or ISTE at the appropriate level of difficulty and complexity for the class.
|
Does not meet B criteria. Objectives do not cover state frameworks or ISTE Standards.
|
5
|
Lesson plans also indicate the constructivist approach to incorporating multicultural and diverse learning styles. The unit plan directly integrates peer or cooperative learning activities for students with disabilities utilizing individual goals, e.g., alternative writing or reading.
|
Detailed lesson plans including all instructions and materials for class activities and graphic instructions for dividing the class into groups and getting them to start work. Unit plan shows teacher considers value of adaptations within cooperative group structure for students with mild disabilities.
|
Does not meet B criteria. Unit plan has minimal or no strategy for adapting cooperative group activities or evaluations for individualization.
|
6
|
The assessment includes both traditional and nontraditional assessments with continual feedback to the student. The assessment should give the student a chance for reflection.
|
An evaluation procedure checking students' learning and including any individual and corporate grading of group work.
|
Does not meet B criteria. Unit plan has minimal or no evaluation to assess group dynamics and/or individual accountability.
|
7
|
See attached Presentation Rubric
|
See attached Presentation Rubric
|
See attached presentation Rubric
|
A=Above Expectations= 25 points max
|
B=Expected= 22 points max
|
Unacceptable = 15points max
|
|
1
|
Rationale meets B criteria and makes an argument convincing to students and community about the value of the unit.
|
Rationale states clear goal for student learning based on district curriculum guide and/or state frameworksand NETS or ISTE. Rationale also includes good reasons for selection of integration of technology.
|
Rationale lacks clear statement of what is taught, why it is being taught, or the reasons for teaching are inadequate.
|
2
|
Task analysis includes detailed analysis of instructional technology skills needed, the skills the class has and a plan for teaching or scaffolding the unknown skills.
|
Task analysis includes limited analysis of instructional technology skills needed, the skills the class has and a plan for teaching or scaffolding the unknown skills.
|
Task analysis is missing or seriously deficient.
|
3
|
Objectives meet B criteria and include higher order goals and inquiry into real world situations or problems with possible solutions.
|
Objectives or outcomes are clearly stated as student learning and include problem solving and critical thinking along with real world situations and/or global application.
|
Objectives do not meet B criteria.
|
4
|
Selection of learning materials meets B criteria and demonstrates that the teacher has an understanding of internet resources and sites necessary for the unit.
|
Selection of learning materials, objectives and activities shows that the teacher understands the subject and has surveyed technology resources available along with student access to technology.
|
Teacher demonstrates lack of knowledge of the subject or of basic lesson planning skills.
|
5
|
Unit plan meets criteria for B and has a component for parental involvement.
|
Unit plan contains an annotated list of resources available on the Internet, utilizes the use of e-mail or one of the instructional strategies for technology integration.
|
Plan does not meet B criteria.
|
6
|
In addition to final evaluation, students are provided continual checking for understanding and regular feedback as to what is right along with what should be corrected.
|
Evaluation is designed to provide teacher and students with feedback on achievement of objectives and uses a variety of assessment techniques..
|
Evaluation does not fit objectives or is not fair or clear.
|
7
|
See attached Presentation Rubric
|
See attached Presentation Rubric
|
See attached Presentation Rubric
|
Professional Presentation
|
8-10
Well organized
|
5-6
Shows basic organization
|
1-3
Unorganized, lacks planning,
|
Knowledge of Subject
|
8-10
Strong understanding of Unit Development, accurate and consistent content
|
5-6
Good understanding of Unit Development; content knowledge factually relevant
|
1-3
Little understanding or comprehension of Unit Development
|
Speaking Skills
|
8-10
Clear enunciation; strong projection; vocal variety; eye contact with entire class; presentation posture; solid focus with no interruptions
|
5-6
Good enunciation; adequate projection; partial audience eye contact; appropriate posture
|
1-3
Difficult to understand; inaudible; monotonous; no eye contact; inappropriate posture; interruptions and distractions
|
Use of Technology
|
15-20
Presentation Utilizes Technology and includes participation by everyone in the group
|
10-14
Presentation of unit is well organized and graduate level quality. The unit has been posted to sced720101
|
5-9
Does Not meet B Criteria.
|