little typewriter

  Creating a Professional-Looking Brief  updated November 8, 2006

A winning advocate knows the importance of creating a polished, professional-looking brief that is an accurate and easy-to-use reference tool for the court. A winning advocate also knows that if a judge's attention to the contents of the brief is distracted or frustrated by its format, the brief's power to persuade is diminished.

The increasing sophistication of law firm computers, printers, and word processing software has had a notable effect on the judge-reader's expectations for the quality of finished briefs. Almost every brief is prepared in-house, using the law firm's word processing equipment. This approach saves costs, but it also permits the lawyer to work right up to the filing deadline. Computers crash, fatigue prevents close proofreading, and the result can be a brief that is an embarrassment, rather than a credit, to the lawyer and firm who produced it.

Why should you know how to format a brief?

Increasingly, lawyers use their computers to draft and print briefs themselves, even if they have the luxury of working for firms with experienced litigation secretaries who already know how to conform the brief's draft to fit the conventions and requirements of the court. It is also true that many lawyers find themselves training inexperienced staff to produce briefs that won't run afoul of the court's rules or the settled expectations of the judge-reader. Finally, thanks to technological "advances" that provide more ways than ever to work outside the office (e.g., laptop computers, pagers, cell phones, e-mail, on-line research from home computers), attorneys are working more nights and weekends (without benefit of secretarial help who would earn overtime pay!).

These tips will help you put together a professional and polished-looking brief. Some of the "tips" are mandated by court rule or this course's formatting requirements for briefs; others are not required by any rule, but will result in a more attractive brief. First impressions do count. A sloppy brief detracts from your credibility. The judge may think, "If this person is so careless with form, the content is probably substandard too."

To go straight to any particular topic, just click below:
 
bulletCovers and binding
bullet Sample cover for federal appellant's brief
bulletSample cover for federal appellee's brief
bulletSample cover for Arkansas appellate brief
bulletPage numbering
bulletJustification
bulletIndentation
bulletTable of Contents
bulletTable of Authorities
bulletWidows and orphans
bulletSafeguarding your work from computer demons

bulletCovers and binding:

Follow the court's rules for covers and binding. Use cardstock or heavier weight paper for your covers. Federal court rules mandate certain colors for the brief covers -- blue for appellant, red for appellee; Arkansas appellate courts do not care what color you use.

Arrange the cover information neatly and attractively. It's your decision whether to center all the information or to arrange in some other manner.  Use "white space" or divider lines to separate items on the cover.

Bind the brief so that there is no risk any pages will come loose. Check your court rules for binding requirements. There are several acceptable methods: e.g., staple-and-tape, spiral, comb. Any full-service copy center can bind your briefs. The copy centers in downtown Little Rock have lots of experience in binding court briefs, and their services are relatively inexpensive. The Moot Court office has binding machinery, but will not hand out supplies. Prof. Barger often has re-cycled materials that you can use. See her if you would like to bind your briefs here at the law school.

 
 
Sample Cover for Appellant's Brief in Federal Court
 

Case No. 2006-7501
 
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

 

Luisa Rodriguez, Appellant,

vs.

Fayetteboro Blood Bank, Appellee.


 

 
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Arkansas
United States District Judge Atticus Hawk, Presiding


APPELLANT'S BRIEF

 

Coleman Gerber
McNeale, Gerber, and LeBoem, L.L.P.
1211 Central Boulevard
Fayetteboro, AR 77772
(501) 555-0122
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT
 
  
Sample Cover for Appellee's Brief in Federal Court
 
Case No. 2006-7501
_____________________________________________
In the United States Court of Appeals
for the Eighth Circuit
_____________________________________________
 
Luisa Rodriguez, Appellant
 vs.
 Fayetteboro Blood Bank, Appellee
  ____________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Arkansas
Honorable Atticus Hawk, Presiding
____________________________________________
Brief of the Appellee,
Fayetteboro Blood Bank
____________________________________________
Ulysses Yooler 
Yooler Law Firm 
Flying W Corporate Center, Suite 519 
1205 McAlmont Street
Big Stone, AR 72202 
(501) 555-9957 
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
 
 

Sample Arkansas Appellate Brief


Case No. 2006-55
 

IN THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT

 

In the Matter of the Adoption of
A.T., a Minor

 

 

Appeal from the Quapaw County Circuit Court
Honorable Ardath Malone, Presiding


APPELLANT'S BRIEF

 

Carole G. Bremen
Arkansas Bar No. 88900
Bremen Law Firm
1101 Kinkaid Street, #523
Fayetteboro, AR 72099
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT,  M.T. Poketz

 

return to topics
 

bulletPage numbering:

Suppress page numbering on the brief's cover. In fact, you may elect to set up your cover as a separate document from the rest of the brief, with no page numbering at all. If you have saved various parts of the brief as separate documents, you will have to adjust the page numbering on each so that it will be consecutive. For that reason, it's better to merge all sections of the brief into a single document.

Begin page numbering with the first white page of the brief itself. Use small roman numerals (i, ii, iii, iv) for all the preliminary sections of the brief that do not count against your page limit (e.g., Table of Contents, Table of Authorities).

For Arkansas briefs, Prof. Barger recommends that you separately number the Abstract with either a footer that identifies the pages as "Abstract 1" or with some sort of abbreviation used with the page number (e.g., "A-1" or "Ab-1"). Because the Abstract does not have a page limit, and because the clerk's office will need to count your Argument pages, this numbering technique will simplify that job for the clerk.

Begin regular page numbering of the substantive portions of the brief with page 1 (set page number "value" to 1).  Number pages at either the bottom center or bottom right. Just a simple number will do. There is no need to put hyphens around the number (-9-) or to insert the word "page" (Page 14).
 

bulletJustification:  
In printing, the term "justification" refers to the way the words at the end of a line appear lined up straight on the margin or whether the margin looks "ragged" (uneven). Your word processor will probably have options for you to select left justification (lined up on left, ragged on right), right justification (lined up on right, ragged on left), or full justification (lined up both left and right). Use either left or full justification in your briefs. Many people like to fully justify the print because it looks very neat and precise. It's acceptable in Arkansas and in the federal courts; a few states' court rules forbid it, however.

A word of warning: WordPerfect versions 6.1 and above have a feature called "Make It Fit." Don't. The feature works by reducing margins, font size, line spacing -- all of which will likely violate your court rules on formatting.

bulletIndentation:
"Indentation" refers to the practice of bringing a line in a certain space from the normal margins. Indent the first line of every paragraph by one-half inch; use the tab key to do this. Never never never hit the space bar 5 times; your indentations will be irregular from paragraph to paragraph.

If you need to bring text in an equal length from both margins (as when you are doing a block format quotation), use the double indent feature of your word processing program.

return to topics 

bulletTable of Contents: 
The Table of Contents references the beginning page for every major section of the brief and every point heading and sub-heading. Any section the court rules call for is such a major section (e.g., Table of Authorities, Statement of the Case, Argument, Addendum). Be sure that your Table of Contents also includes the title and beginning page number for each item in the Abstract and/or Addendum. Every point heading and sub-heading is a sign-post for a major section of the Argument; include the page number where each such heading is found.

For ease of reading, consider typing headings in normal type in the Table of Contents, even though you have put them in caps, bold, italics, or underlining in the body of the Argument. Duplicate the outline numbering system you've used for these headings in the body of the Argument, and do indent the sub-headings.

Use dot leaders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to connect the table entry and the page or pages where it is located. Avoid manually typing a period space period space etc. until you get to the right margin. You will end up with a wavy line at the right margin.

Do not crowd text into or over the space for page numbers. Use plenty of white space to make your tables attractive and easy to read. Remember that no court rule mandates a page limit for your tables. Either double indent the entry or hit the "enter" key to go to a new line.

Sample Point Heading

I. Cottontree's Chemical Screen Test Policy fails Vernonia's
efficacy requirement because the policy requires all
students to submit to drug testing but penalizes only
those students who drive to school. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
 

return to topics

bulletTable of Authorities:
The Table of Authorities must reference the location of each full citation and short form used anywhere in the substantive portions of the brief. For Arkansas briefs, this means to reference citations not just in the body of the Argument, but also any citations used in support of the Points on Appeal. Do not, however, reference an authority mentioned only in a parenthetical to another citation. It is also unnecessary to reference authorities that appear only in the Abstract or Addendum.

Put the full citation (including subsequent history, if any) into the table. The table entry for a citation to an authority using page numbers should provide only the page on which the cited authority begins, not the authority's pinpoint page numbers.

If an authority is cited at so many pages in your brief that you'll have more than two-thirds of a line of page number references, use the abbreviation passim instead of giving the page numbers. (The term tells the reader that this authority is practically everywhere!) But don't get carried away: Use passim sparingly, if at all. The judges who read your brief want to be able to easily find the authorities you have cited. Italicize or underline passim, according to whether you are using italics or underlining in your citations.

Group your authorities by category (e.g., cases, constitutional provisions, statutes, rules, secondary authorities). Unless court rules require it, do not break cases down into sub-categories by jurisdiction (U.S. Supreme Court, Federal Circuits, State Courts). This practice unnecessarily complicates the table's usefulness and may irritate the judges reading your brief, as it forces them to try to remember which court decided a case or to look in several places for the citation they need.

Alphabetize the entries, or if they are numeric, put them in numerical order. If they are alpha-numeric, organize by whatever comes first, the letter or the number (e.g., put Ark. Code Ann. references before N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law before Vt. Stat. Ann. Put 5 U.S.C. § 1440 before 23 U.S.C. § 205.)

Alphabetize your entries in the Table of Authorities

For cases, alphabetize by the first party name. If more than one case begins with the same name (e.g., United States), then organize by the opponent's name (e.g., United States v. Leon before United States v. Lynch before United States v. Sakowskie).

For secondary authorities, alphabetize by the author's last name, even if you are following citation rules for writing the author's name in normal order, firstname lastname. Thus, the table will put Zachary Abramson ahead of Abigail Zimmerman.

Because citations are almost always long enough to take up most of a line, you can use a "hanging indent"-style format to attractively format them.  (In a hanging indent, the top line is at left margin; the succeeding lines of the citation are indented beneath.) If you find that the length of the citation is running into the area for the table's page numbers, hit "enter" and indent again. Your goal is to keep from crowding the area for page numbers.

Sample Entries for Table of Authorities

Chandler v. Miller,
    520 U.S. 305 (1997) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9, 10, 12

 Maitland v. University of Minnesota,
    155 F.3d 1013 (8th Cir. 1998). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

 Todd v. Rush County Sch.,
    133 F.3d 984 (7th Cir. 1998). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . . 13, 14, 18, 21

bulletWidows and orphans:

Use your word processing program to prevent "widows and orphans." This phrase refers to a single line of text from a paragraph that is standing alone at the bottom or top of a page. Set the word processing program to always keep at least two lines of text together.
 

bulletSafeguarding your work from computer demons:   
Save your work in more than one place, and back up often. Computers been known to crash right before a brief's filing deadline. Disks become corrupted. E-mail a copy to yourself. Print out a hard copy from time to time; if all else fails, you can scan your printed draft.

return to topics